You’ll identify metal detecting finds by cross-referencing your detector’s Target ID numbers with the physical markings on recovered objects. High conductivity readings (91-96) typically indicate silver, while copper pennies register 18-27. Once you’ve excavated a target, examine it for hallmarks, date stamps, and mint marks that confirm composition and age. Visual corrosion patterns provide additional clues—copper develops green patina, iron shows rust, and silver displays black tarnish. The following sections will demonstrate systematic verification techniques that transform raw conductivity data into authenticated material identification.
Key Takeaways
- Examine manufacturer stamps, hallmarks, or date marks on coins and jewelry to determine origin, age, and metal content.
- Research letter codes, symbols, or numeric stamps using reference guides to identify makers, purity levels, or production periods.
- Silver items often display purity marks like “925” or “Sterling”; gold shows karat stamps like “14K” or “18K”.
- Coins with mint marks, dates, or country indicators help establish rarity, value, and historical significance before cleaning.
- Cross-reference visible markings with online databases or catalogs to confirm authenticity and avoid misidentifying valuable finds.
Understanding Target ID Number Ranges and What They Reveal
Target ID numbers function as a detector’s primary classification system, translating subsurface conductivity measurements into numerical values that indicate probable metal composition. You’ll encounter different scales depending on your equipment—Minelab Vanquish models use –9 to 40, while most VLF detectors employ a standard 00 to 99 range.
Lower numbers on the conductivity spectrum signal ferrous materials and aluminum foil, whereas higher values indicate coins and jewelry. Gold produces positive IDs, typically registering at lower numbers for small, low-conductivity pieces.
Your detector assigns these values based on target conductivity: larger silver coins yield higher readings, while small or flat objects produce lower numbers. The last detected Target ID remains visible for 5 seconds or until a new target is found, allowing you to reference the value while deciding whether to dig. Understanding these ranges empowers you to make informed dig decisions without discrimination patterns limiting your recovery potential.
Keep in mind that Target ID shifts with depth, causing deeper objects to display different numerical values than identical items near the surface. Experienced detectorists recognize typical target ID ranges—bullets commonly register at 17-18, while coins frequently appear at 11-12—but rely more heavily on audio tones than numbers for accurate identification in field conditions.
Decoding Low Target ID Readings for Iron and Aluminum Objects
When you encounter VDI readings below 20, you’re detecting ferrous materials such as iron or steel.
Though differentiating these from aluminum foil requires additional analysis since foil can produce overlapping signals in the 30-40 range.
To verify whether a low signal represents a genuine ferrous target rather than a false reading, you must assess signal consistency by rotating around the target and sweeping from multiple angles.
Stable, repeatable low-tone responses with accompanying iron buzz at 100 iron volume confirm ferrous composition, whereas erratic or vanishing signals typically indicate ground mineralization, electromagnetic interference, or target positioning effects.
Wet ground conditions can amplify signal strength for both ferrous and non-ferrous targets, potentially making discrimination more challenging in low VDI ranges.Deeper ferrous objects will generate weaker signals that may require increasing your detector’s sensitivity settings to maintain adequate detection capability.
Distinguishing Iron From Foil
Since most metal detectors employ Variable Discriminate Indicator (VDI) systems to classify buried objects by conductivity, understanding the distinction between ferrous and non-ferrous materials at the low end of the Target ID scale becomes essential for effective field discrimination.
Key differentiation methods include:
- Signal polarity analysis – Iron exhibits negative VDI values while aluminum foil registers positive readings within the nickel range.
- Metal composition verification – Phase delay measurements separate ferrous materials from non-ferrous aluminum through conductivity response timing.
- Multi-angle scanning – Iron produces erratic, orientation-dependent signals with broken tones, whereas foil yields consistent mid-low responses.
- Audio signature recognition – Iron emits characteristic grunts upon rescanning, while aluminum maintains stable tonal patterns.
Mineralized soil conditions may shift foil readings toward ferrous territory, requiring adjusted discrimination thresholds. The detector’s transmit coil generates a magnetic signal that induces eddy currents in the target, enabling the discrimination system to analyze the returned electromagnetic response for accurate identification. Aggressive discrimination settings at the low conductivity range risk overlooking small gold items and thin artifacts that share similar Target ID values with aluminum foil.
Verifying Stable Low Signals
After isolating a potential target through initial discrimination, you must evaluate whether stable low signals warrant excavation or indicate common ferrous debris.
Conduct multiple sweeps from perpendicular angles while monitoring signal amplitude variation. Consistent VDI below 20 confirms iron trash, whereas aluminum registers 30-60 with mid-tones.
Proper metal detector calibration eliminates false positives from mineralized soil; reduce sensitivity until readings stabilize, then verify ground balance settings.
Cross-reference three indicators: VDI consistency, tonal quality, and depth estimation.
Shallow targets producing loud, flat tones typically represent surface junk regardless of stable VDI.
In high-mineralization environments, lower your sensitivity incrementally until you achieve repeatable signals. Orientation of metal objects can influence detection accuracy, so rotate your coil position if readings seem inconsistent.
Iron generates boring, grunting responses, while aluminum produces crisper feedback despite overlapping VDI ranges. Low-tone signals typically indicate ferrous junk like iron, helping you avoid unnecessary digging by differentiating debris from potential treasures.
This systematic verification prevents wasted effort on ferrous debris.
Interpreting Mid-Range Signals for Coins and Jewelry
Mid-range signals—typically spanning VDI values from 20 to 60 on most metal detectors—present the greatest interpretive challenge because they encompass both desirable targets like gold jewelry and nickel coins as well as ubiquitous trash items such as aluminum pull-tabs and foil fragments.
The 20-60 VDI range demands careful interpretation, separating valuable gold and nickel from aluminum trash through systematic verification techniques.
Mid tone identification requires systematic verification protocols to maximize recovery efficiency.
Target Consistency Assessment Protocol:
- Multi-angle sweep verification – Conduct detector passes from perpendicular orientations. Solid targets maintain stable readings while irregular trash produces erratic responses.
- Audio signature analysis – Consistent tones across repeated sweeps indicate homogeneous metallic composition characteristic of coins and jewelry. Detecting non-ferrous metals like aluminum and copper in this range proves more challenging due to their conductive-only properties. Operating at 10-15 kHz frequencies provides balanced sensitivity for these mid-conductivity targets while maintaining adequate detection depth.
- Depth correlation – Signal volume diminishes proportionally with target depth. Stable attenuation patterns suggest legitimate finds.
- Discrimination threshold testing – Adjust settings incrementally. Valuable mid-conductivity items respond predictably versus fragmented debris.
High Target ID Numbers as Indicators of Valuable Metals
High Target ID numbers typically correlate with highly conductive metals, particularly silver and copper, which register at the upper end of detector scales due to their electrical properties.
When you operate in discrimination mode, these elevated readings enable you to differentiate valuable targets from ferrous debris and low-conductivity trash items.
Additionally, modern detectors provide depth indicators alongside high Target IDs, allowing you to assess whether signals originate from shallow surface clutter or deeper buried valuables worth excavation.
Silver and Copper Signals
When metal detecting in the field, silver and copper targets generate distinctively high Target ID numbers that serve as primary indicators for valuable finds. Signal consistency improves through understanding detector-specific patterns and metal alloy identification principles.
Silver and Copper Target ID Ranges:
- Silver coins: Register 91-96 on most detectors, with Morgan Silver Dollars and Walking Liberty Halves consistently hitting 96 on Garrett AT Pro models.
- Copper pennies: Display readings between 18-27 depending on age and detector profile settings.
- Brass objects: Fall within 40-60 range, with substantial pieces producing higher conductivity signals.
- Mixed-metal items: Elevation of Target ID occurs when silver combines with lower-conductivity metals in alloy composition.
Understanding these numerical patterns enables efficient field discrimination, allowing you to prioritize high-value targets without unnecessary excavation of ferrous materials.
Depth Indicator Benefits
Target ID numbers above 70 on VLF detectors function as critical conductivity indicators that distinguish valuable non-ferrous metals from disposable aluminum waste. When you combine these elevated VDI readings with depth indicators, you’ll optimize excavation decisions through dual-parameter verification.
Shallow targets produce stable high IDs alongside accurate depth readings, confirming viable recovery prospects. However, buried depths beyond six inches may introduce ID instability, requiring you to average multiple sweep readings.
Advanced XY screen displays enhance depth accuracy by correlating vertical positioning with conductivity data. You’ll notice prolonged high tones accompanying deep targets, signaling substantial size despite signal attenuation.
This synergy between Target ID consistency and depth estimation empowers autonomous field decisions, reducing unproductive digging while maximizing valuable metal recovery rates across variable soil matrices.
Discrimination Mode Advantages
Discrimination mode empowers you to filter metallic targets by leveraging conductivity-based Target ID classifications, typically spanning 0-99 on VLF detectors or –9 to 40 on Minelab Vanquish models. This functionality enables autonomous decision-making through strategic pattern configuration.
- Conductivity Segmentation: High Target IDs (representing gold, silver, copper) trigger sustained clear tones, while rejected segments produce brief grunts, establishing immediate tone analysis feedback.
- Notch Customization: You’ll reject specific high-ID ranges like ring pulls (28-32) while preserving adjacent valuable zones through precision discrimination pattern adjustments.
- Visual Confirmation: LCD segments illuminate corresponding to detected IDs, persisting five seconds for verification before reverting to standby.
- Pattern Storage: Custom configurations override default settings, maintaining your optimized high-conductivity filters across detection sessions without repetitive programming.
Recognizing Visual Corrosion Patterns on Recovered Items
Visual corrosion patterns constitute primary diagnostic indicators for metal identification in field recovery contexts. Your corrosion inspection begins by examining color signatures: copper exhibits green or blue-green patina in humid conditions, while verdigris appears as powdery green crust.
Iron displays red-brown rust formations, with flash rusting indicating sudden humidity exposure. Lead develops white crystalline deposits or dark gray tarnish, requiring careful handling due to toxicity. Silver presents black patina without copper’s characteristic green hues—you’ll confirm this through non-magnetic testing.
Aluminum demonstrates exceptional oxidation resistance with minimal surface alteration, contrasting brass’s characteristic sheen. Patina identification enables you to distinguish alloys through systematic observation: green corrosion suggests copper content, white crusting indicates lead composition, and red-brown oxidation confirms ferrous materials.
Understanding these diagnostic patterns grants independence from laboratory analysis.
Reading Hallmarks and Date Stamps on Jewelry and Coins

When examining recovered jewelry and coins, hallmark interpretation provides definitive authentication and dating evidence beyond surface corrosion analysis.
You’ll identify metal composition and origin through systematic mark analysis, liberating yourself from speculation about your finds’ true nature.
Essential identification steps:
- Examine with magnification – Use a jeweler’s loupe on hidden areas like ring bands and clasps where hallmark symbols typically appear.
- Decode purity marks – Match numerical stamps (925 for sterling silver, 750 for 18K gold) against standard fineness tables.
- Cross-reference assay offices – Identify symbols like Birmingham’s anchor or London’s leopard’s head to determine geographic origin.
- Apply date letter charts – Match letter style and cartouche shape to chronological references for precise assay timeframe.
This methodical approach transforms ambiguous artifacts into documented historical specimens with verified provenance.
Using Pinpointers to Verify Target Location and Composition
After your primary detector identifies a subsurface anomaly, deploying a handheld pinpointer establishes precise spatial coordinates within the excavation zone, effectively eliminating the inefficiency of broad-spectrum soil displacement.
You’ll execute systematic X-pattern scanning protocols across the suspected target area, observing progressive audio-visual feedback as probe proximity decreases. The device’s concentrated sensitivity field—typically spanning mere centimeters—enables rapid discrimination between desired artifacts and adjacent ferrous contaminants in trash-dense environments.
Regular pinpointer calibration ensures measurement accuracy across varying soil mineralization levels, while firmware updates optimize detection algorithms for enhanced target differentiation.
You’ll probe excavation walls and extracted soil clods laterally, exploiting the unit’s omnidirectional sensing capabilities. This methodology minimizes excavation footprint, preserves site integrity, and accelerates recovery cycles—granting you maximum detecting autonomy without bureaucratic site-restoration constraints.
Grid Search Methods for Consistent Signal Confirmation

Systematic coverage protocols transform haphazard reconnaissance into reproducible investigation methodology, ensuring you’ll interrogate subsurface strata with quantifiable thoroughness rather than intuitive wandering.
Ground marking establishes verifiable search parameters, liberating you from bureaucratic oversight while maintaining evidentiary standards.
Methodical boundary designation transforms reconnaissance from regulated activity into defensible, documentation-ready field operations under personal discretion.
Core Implementation Protocols:
- Classic Grid Configuration – Establish parallel lanes at 75% coil diameter width, achieving 25% overlap to eliminate detection gaps through autonomous lane selection.
- Physical Demarcation Systems – Deploy poker chips, cordage, or mineral markers at boundary intersections, creating self-directed navigation without external tracking requirements.
- Spiral Intensification – Concentrate efforts outward from productive epicenters using 75% spacing intervals for unrestricted hotspot exploitation.
- GPS Autonomy – Program waypoint matrices eliminating ground marking dependencies, enabling sovereign coverage across expansive territories.
Frequently Asked Questions
How Do I Clean Oxidized Coins Without Damaging Their Collectible Value?
You shouldn’t clean oxidized coins—cleaning techniques irreversibly damage collectible value by removing original luster. Instead, employ preservation methods: rinse gently with distilled water, pat dry, and consult professional conservators. Natural patina protects your finds’ authenticity and market worth.
What Legal Permissions Are Required Before Metal Detecting on Public Property?
You’ll need to verify public land regulations with federal agencies and obtain required permits before detecting. Permission requirements vary by jurisdiction—consult Forest Service offices, state park authorities, and local land managers to guarantee compliance with applicable restrictions.
Can Saltwater Beach Conditions Affect Target ID Accuracy and Signal Stability?
Yes—saltwater interference dramatically compromises your detector’s performance. You’ll experience signal distortion from high mineralization, requiring immediate sensitivity adjustments and ground balance recalibration. Multi-frequency modes in Salt settings counter these environmental variables, restoring target ID accuracy and operational stability.
Which Reference Guides Help Identify Unmarked Military Relics and Vintage Buttons?
You’ll find Groundbreakers Book and Albert’s guide most valuable for button identification of unmarked specimens. Cross-reference military markings through comparative typology, examining manufacturing context and regimental patterns. Civil War Artifacts by Crouch provides essential visual documentation for field analysis.
How Should I Document and Catalog Discovered Finds for Insurance Purposes?
Cover your bases by photographing finds with scale references from multiple angles, recording discovery locations and dates in detailed finding recordkeeping logs. Your cataloging procedures should document markings, historical context, and estimated values, maintaining both digital and physical inventories for insurance claims.
References
- https://www.joanallen.co.uk/how-to-read-a-metal-detector-target-id-setting
- https://kellycodetectors.com/blog/2025-ultimate-beginners-guide-to-metal-detecting-faq-guide/
- https://seriousdetecting.com/blogs/detecting-prospecting/identify-metal-detecting-finds
- https://www.metaldetector.com/pages/learnbuying-guide-articlesgetting-startedtarget-id-chart-comparing-top-metal-detector-models
- https://metaldetectingforum.com/index.php?threads/general-metal-detecting-guide.60491/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhkNOheeCko
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6p-LwPCh1w
- https://seriousdetecting.com/blogs/detecting-prospecting/minelab-vanquish-440-540-target-identification
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7lKL7fiJIE
- https://detectorpower.com/blogs/metal-detectors/how-to-read-metal-detectors



