To rank dig sites, you need a scoring system built around XP per hour—nothing else drives progression faster. Measure each site by XP yield per cycle, total duration per level, and tier access requirements. Site A delivers half a level in 10 hours, Site B needs 15 hours, and Site C cycles in just 34 seconds. Weight these criteria against your current prospecting level and goals, and the rankings practically build themselves—keep going to master the full system.
Key Takeaways
- Rank dig sites primarily by XP per hour, as historical significance, visual appeal, and environmental impact don’t affect progression.
- Build a scoring matrix using XP rate, session duration, tier accessibility, and site difficulty to evaluate sites objectively.
- Longer time-per-level durations lower a site’s ranking; Site B’s 15-hour rate trails Site A’s 10-hour yield.
- Teleport access improves Site B’s competitiveness by reducing travel delays, though it doesn’t surpass Site A’s efficiency rate.
- Prioritize unlocking higher tiers early, as each tier shift delivers faster, denser XP gains across excavation sessions.
Why XP Per Hour Is the Only Dig Site Metric That Matters
When comparing dig sites, only one number cuts through the noise: XP per hour. Ignore historical significance, environmental impact, and visual appeal — they don’t move your progress bar. What matters is how efficiently each site converts your time into levels.
Site A delivers roughly half a level across 10 hours. Site B starts at 15 hours per level completion. Site C, however, offers the second-best XP rate, clocking 34 seconds of level-one experience per cycle.
Site A gives half a level in 10 hours. Site B needs 15. Site C? Just 34 seconds per cycle.
Run the math, and Site C pulls ahead early.
You control your grind. Don’t let sentimental metrics dictate your excavation order. Rank each site by pure XP output, prioritize accordingly, and you’ll unlock higher-tier sites faster — compounding your efficiency gains over every session.
The Three Criteria That Determine Dig Site Rankings
Three criteria drive every dig site ranking decision: XP yield per cycle, total duration per level, and tier access requirements.
You evaluate mineral deposits by how efficiently they convert time into progression. A site producing half a level in ten hours outperforms one requiring fifteen hours for equivalent output.
Tier access determines which sites you can even consider. Locked tiers restrict your excavation tools from reaching higher-yield deposits until you meet the prospecting level threshold. You can’t optimize what you can’t access.
Apply all three criteria simultaneously. XP yield without duration context misleads you. Duration without tier eligibility wastes analysis.
Combining all three filters surfaces your highest-leverage option given your current progression state, keeping your decision systematic and your advancement trajectory as efficient as possible.
How Prospecting Level Unlocks Higher-Tier Dig Sites
Your prospecting level acts as the primary gatekeeper, restricting access to higher-tier dig sites until you meet each threshold requirement.
As you advance, you’ll gain access to Site B at Windswept Beach and eventually Site C, each offering progressively better XP efficiency than the tier below.
Prioritizing level gains early accelerates your access to these superior sites, compounding your overall XP output over time.
Level Requirements Unlock Sites
As you advance your prospecting level, higher-tier dig sites open and grant access to more efficient XP yields. Each tier operates as a locked gate — your level functions as the key.
Site A becomes accessible early, delivering roughly half a level per 10 hours using basic excavation tools against shallow mineral deposits.
Site B unveils next, positioned at Windswept Beach, with level completion starting at 15 hours.
Site C offers the second-best efficiency, producing level one XP every 34 seconds under prime conditions.
Tracking these thresholds lets you plan progression without wasted effort. You control the pace by targeting the highest unlocked tier available.
Prioritize advancement systematically, and each unlocked site compounds your overall XP efficiency across the full excavation progression chain.
Higher Tiers, Better XP
Revealing higher-tier dig sites directly multiplies your XP output, making prospecting level the most critical variable in excavation efficiency. Each unlocked tier compounds your returns, shifting you from slower, lower-yield excavations toward faster, denser XP accumulation.
Site C delivers second-best efficiency at level one, offering 34 seconds of baseline XP. Site B, accessible at Windswept Beach, extends duration to 15 hours per level completion, rewarding sustained historical accuracy in your progression tracking.
Site A scales further, yielding half a level across roughly 10 hours.
Understanding environmental impact across tiers matters — higher sites demand more resources and time investment, but the ratio favors advancement. Prioritize unlocking each tier systematically, and you reclaim control over your excavation trajectory, maximizing output per session without redundant effort.
Time-Per-Level at Each Dig Site: The Real Numbers
When choosing where to dig, the time-per-level data separates efficient grinding from wasted sessions. Each site delivers measurably different returns, and your mining strategies should reflect those differences directly.
Site A yields roughly half a level per 10 hours — slow, but accessible early. Site B, positioned at Windswept Beach, starts at 15 hours per level completion, making it a mid-tier commitment requiring deliberate prospecting techniques before you commit your time.
Site A crawls at half a level per 10 hours. Site B demands 15 — know your commitment before you dig.
Site C outperforms both in short bursts, delivering level-one XP in just 34 seconds, ranking it as the second-best site overall.
Map your available play time against these numbers before you commit. Efficient players don’t guess — they calculate, prioritize high-return sites, and rotate deliberately based on current level thresholds and session length.
Site A, B, and C: What Each Dig Site Actually Delivers
When you compare all three dig sites side by side, the yield differences become immediately clear and actionable.
Site A delivers roughly half a level per 10 hours.
Site B starts at 15 hours per level completion.
Site C provides 34 seconds of level one XP as the second-best option available.
If you’re prioritizing XP efficiency, Site C’s output rate positions it above Site B, making it your strongest early target before gaining access to higher-tier options.
Site Yields Compared
Three dig sites define your excavation options, and each delivers a measurably different XP return that directly shapes your leveling strategy. Site A yields roughly half a level per 10 hours, making it a slow but accessible starting point before you’ve gained better prospecting tools.
Site B, positioned at Windswept Beach, demands 15 hours per level completion, meaning your mining equipment sits committed longer for each progression gain.
Site C outperforms both in raw efficiency, delivering level one XP in just 34 seconds, securing its position as the second-best available site.
Comparing these three analytically, Site C maximizes time-per-XP ratios, Site A offers mid-range accessibility, and Site B carries the highest time cost.
Prioritize accordingly based on your current uncover tier and available play window.
Best Site For XP
Knowing each site‘s yield is only half the equation — the other half is matching that yield to your actual play conditions. Your mining equipment and session length determine which site actually maximizes your XP efficiency.
Site C delivers the fastest short-burst returns, offering the second-best XP rate with 34-second level one cycles — ideal if your prospecting strategies favor quick, active sessions.
Site A suits longer commitments, yielding roughly half a level across 10 hours. It’s reliable but demands patience.
Site B, anchored at Windswept Beach, starts at 15 hours per level completion, making it a dedicated grind requiring serious time investment.
Match each site to your available window. Short session? Run Site C. Extended grind? Site A or B scales your returns accordingly.
Does Teleport Access to Site B Change the Math?
How much does teleport access to Site B actually shift the efficiency calculation? Considerably. Teleport access eliminates travel overhead, meaning you’re not bleeding time on movement between sessions. That changes site accessibility from a logistical burden into a near-zero cost variable.
Without teleport, Site B’s 15-hour completion baseline already trails Site A‘s roughly 10-hour half-level yield. Add manual travel time, and Site B falls further behind. With teleport, you recover those lost minutes, but you’re still not closing the gap enough to overtake Site A’s output rate.
Teleport access makes Site B more competitive, not dominant. If you’re optimizing purely for XP per hour, Site A still holds the edge. Teleport simply ensures Site B remains a viable secondary option rather than an inefficient detour.
Rank Dig Sites by Goal: Speed, Volume, or Balance?
What you’re optimizing for determines which dig site earns the top slot. Your mining strategies must align with a clearly defined goal before you commit to any location.
If you’re chasing speed, Site C delivers fast XP cycling with its 34-second level one intervals.
If volume matters more, Site A’s steady output over 10 hours builds consistent progression without interruption.
If you’re balancing both, Site B’s teleport access reduces travel overhead, making it a strong middle-ground option despite its 15-hour starting duration.
Run your prospecting tools against each site’s XP-per-hour ratio, factor in your current unlock tier, and assign rankings accordingly.
Your goal defines the metric. Your metric defines the site. Choose deliberately.
Which Dig Site Fits Your Current Prospecting Level?
Your current prospecting level gates which sites you can access, so matching your release tier to the right location isn’t optional—it’s foundational. Three distinct tiers exist—Site A, B, and C—each unlocking progressively as your prospecting level advances.
Site A delivers roughly half a level per 10 hours, making it your baseline for early prospect growth.
Once you’ve unlocked mid-tier access, Site B at Windswept Beach extends that timeline to 15 hours per level, offering a scalable step up.
Site C operates as the second-best option, generating level-one XP in 34-second intervals.
Systematic site improvement depends on aligning your current tier to the site’s XP output. Don’t queue into higher-tier sites prematurely—efficiency compounds only when level requirements and site mechanics match precisely.
Build Your Own Dig Site Scoring System
Once you’ve identified what matters most to your playstyle—XP efficiency, accessibility, or time investment—you can define your scoring criteria and assign weighted point values to each factor.
Build a simple matrix where high-priority factors like XP yield carry more weight than secondary considerations like travel distance.
Test your rankings against real sessions, track the results, and refine the weights until your system consistently directs you to the most efficient site first.
Define Your Scoring Criteria
Before committing time to any excavation site, you’ll need a structured scoring framework that weighs XP efficiency, time investment, and accessibility against your current prospecting level.
Historical context from each site’s unlock requirements and tech innovations in prospecting mechanics both shape which criteria matter most.
Define your scoring criteria around these four variables:
- XP rate: How much experience per hour does the site realistically deliver?
- Duration thresholds: Does a 10-hour or 15-hour completion window fit your schedule?
- Level accessibility: Does your current prospecting level actually unlock the site?
- Teleport efficiency: Can you reach the site without significant travel overhead?
Assign each criterion a weighted value, then calculate a composite score per site.
This systematic approach lets you prioritize autonomously, without guesswork.
Assign Weighted Point Values
Building a weighted scoring system turns your four criteria into a single, comparable number for each dig site. Assign each criterion a percentage that reflects its priority—resource allocation demands the heaviest weight since it directly controls your time and material returns.
Skill development earns secondary weight because it compounds long-term efficiency gains.
A sample distribution might look like this: resource yield at 40%, skill development at 25%, accessibility at 20%, and site difficulty at 15%. Each site then scores 1–10 per criterion. Multiply each score by its weight, then sum the results.
That final number lets you compare sites objectively, without guesswork. Adjust your percentages whenever your goals shift—your scoring system should serve your priorities, not constrain them.
Test And Refine Rankings
Your weighted scores mean nothing until field data either confirms or challenges them. Run your system against real digs, then measure how well predictions matched outcomes.
Track these variables during each session:
- Equipment durability ratings versus actual wear rates logged on-site
- Environmental impact scores compared to observed terrain degradation
- XP yield efficiency against projected time-per-level calculations
- Accessibility scores versus real travel and setup friction
After three to five sessions, recalibrate your point values. If equipment durability consistently outweighs your initial weighting, increase its multiplier. If environmental impact proved negligible at certain sites, reduce its coefficient.
Your scoring system isn’t static—it’s a living framework. Treat each dig as a controlled test, isolate variables, and adjust accordingly. Precision compounds over time when you commit to iterative refinement.
Common Dig Site Ranking Mistakes That Cost You Levels
Skipping straight to Site A without checking your prospecting level locks you out of higher-efficiency sites and wastes playtime you can’t recover.
Skipping Site A level checks costs you access to higher-efficiency sites and unrecoverable playtime.
Ignoring mining safety protocols compounds this error — you’ll burn resources on sites your current level can’t efficiently process.
Treat equipment maintenance the same way: unoptimized tools reduce XP yield per session, cutting into time you’d otherwise spend at Site C or Site B.
Other critical mistakes include misidentifying Site B’s teleport function, causing unnecessary travel delays, and underestimating Site C’s 34-second level-one XP advantage.
Players also neglect tier sequencing, jumping between sites without a structured progression path.
Each mistake compounds the last.
Audit your current level, verify site unlock requirements, and commit to a linear tier strategy before you invest a single hour of dig time.
Dig the Best Ground First
Not every site deserves your Saturday. Subterrix’s DeepStrike scores and ranks locations by real potential, so you spend your time where the odds are best instead of guessing. Treasure Valley Metal Detecting Club members get Subterrix Elite for $8.99 a month instead of the standard $15.99, with 20% of every membership coming back to the club to fund hunts, raffles, and giveaways.
Join Subterrix under TVMDC for $8.99/month
Disclosure: TVMDC earns a share of membership revenue when you join through this link, at no extra cost to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Dig Site Rankings Change After a Game Update or Patch?
Yes, dig site hierarchy can shift like tectonic plates after patches. When ranking system updates drop, you’ll want to re-evaluate your excavation priorities, as XP rates, durations, and tier efficiencies often change dramatically with each update.
Do Dig Site Bonuses Stack With Experience-Boosting Equipment or Buffs?
The knowledge base doesn’t confirm bonus stacking behavior. You’ll need to test equipment effects directly at each site tier, systematically tracking XP gains with and without buffs to analytically determine whether dig site bonuses stack in your setup.
Is There a Maximum Number of Dig Sites You Can Unlock?
The knowledge doesn’t confirm a maximum cap on accessible dig sites. You’ll want to manage your resource management strategically across the three tiers—A, B, and C—while refining your exploration strategies based on XP efficiency per site.
shared excavation isn’t confirmed in the available data. You won’t find multiplayer benefits documented across the dig site tiers. Until verified, assume each site’s XP efficiency applies to your solo session only.
Do Seasonal Events Ever Temporarily Alter Dig Site XP Rates?
The available knowledge doesn’t confirm whether seasonal events alter dig site XP rates. You’ll want to verify this directly through game update logs, as no seasonal event XP rate modifications appear in the current excavation site tier data.
References
- https://prepdig.com/how-we-rank/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llhalWwOPsA
- https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ranking-systems-guide
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6y-MK7WgDs
