Expert Insights On Preserving And Cleaning Finds

preservation and cleaning techniques

You’ll preserve archaeological finds by maintaining controlled storage at 60-72°F with material-specific humidity levels, applying immediate stabilizing treatments like Acryloid B72 consolidants, and using chemical solutions such as benzotriazole for copper alloys or tannic acid for iron. Support fragile objects with conservation-grade polymers and backing materials during excavation, employ jacketing techniques with plaster-bandage combinations for transport, and utilize freeze-drying for waterlogged organics. Pre-treatment X-radiography guides mechanical cleaning while preventing surface damage. These foundational protocols establish the framework for thorough artifact conservation strategies explored throughout the following sections.

Key Takeaways

  • Store artifacts in controlled environments: 60-72°F temperature, tailored RH below 65% for organics, below 35% to prevent active corrosion.
  • Apply protective coatings like Acryloid B72 and waxes immediately post-excavation to isolate artifacts from environmental degradation.
  • Use benzotriazole for copper alloys and tannic acid for iron; electrolytic reduction effectively removes chloride contamination.
  • Stabilize waterlogged wood through freeze-drying to remove moisture and halt microbial activity without chemical intervention.
  • Handle artifacts with well-fitting gloves, store in acid-free materials, and regularly inspect for early deterioration signs.

Establishing Optimal Dry Storage Conditions for Archaeological Artifacts

Because archaeological artifacts deteriorate rapidly under improper conditions, you must establish precise environmental controls immediately after excavation. Climate control requires maintaining temperatures between 60°F and 72°F while targeting specific RH levels: organic materials below 65%, unstable iron below 12%, and glass between 30-42%.

You’ll achieve stability through well-gasketed museum cabinets that shield against fluctuations.

Storage materials demand careful selection based on artifact composition. Create desiccated microclimates using airtight containers with silica gel sachets for metals, maintaining RH below 20%.

Choose acid-free boxes with padding to prevent movement damage. Document all post-excavation conditions—RH percentages, temperatures, and materials used—ensuring you maintain complete control over preservation variables.

Avoid plastic bags for wet stone; paper envelopes provide proper moisture exchange without restriction. Handle artifacts with clean gloves to prevent deterioration from natural oils and sweat transferred through direct contact. Regular backup of digital records following archival best practices ensures comprehensive tracking of environmental conditions and artifact management throughout the preservation process.

Chemical Solutions for Metal Object Stabilization

While mechanical cleaning removes surface contaminants, chemical stabilization addresses the underlying corrosion processes that continue degrading metal artifacts after excavation.

Chemical stabilization halts the invisible corrosion reactions that persist beneath the surface long after excavation is complete.

You’ll find benzotriazole (BTA) remains the best option for copper alloys, requiring one-hour immersion treatments—though you must handle this suspected carcinogen cautiously.

For iron objects, tannic acid offers effective protection through chemical pH adjustment (pH 2-3), forming stable ferric tannate complexes. Apply at least three coats of 20% solution using stiff brushes for ideal surface coating continuity.

When confronting stubborn rust, EDTA removes light corrosion layers while phosphoric acid converts rust into stable iron phosphate.

Marine-recovered metals demand electrolytic reduction with controlled electrode potential, addressing extreme chloride contamination that standard methods can’t eliminate. Careful current control prevents damage during the reduction process, as excessive electrical flow can harm the artifact’s remaining structure. Full wave rectified units provide smoother and more stable output compared to half-wave alternatives, improving overall treatment effectiveness.

Always test diluted solutions beforehand to prevent irreversible damage.

Protecting Corrosion Layers During Pre-Treatment Storage

Once you’ve excavated metal artifacts, maintaining their existing corrosion layers becomes critical—these patinas often contain valuable archaeological information and protect the underlying metal from further degradation.

You’ll need to control environmental conditions immediately. Maintain relative humidity at or below 55% for stable objects, dropping below 35% for actively corroding pieces.

Apply protective coatings like VCI wraps and vapor corrosion inhibitors that form molecular barriers without disturbing surface layers.

Store copper alloys in acid-free unbuffered materials, avoiding ammonia and chlorides. Elevate storage 150mm above floors to prevent ground moisture contact.

Use sealed cabinets or perforated polyethylene bags for controlled atmospheres. Temperature fluctuations cause expansion and contraction that can stress protective surface layers, so maintain stable thermal conditions throughout the storage period.

Deploy barrier coatings on secondary surfaces while preserving original patinas.

Regular inspection protocols identify changes before irreversible damage occurs, giving you autonomy over preservation decisions. Wear well-fitting plastic or clean cotton gloves when handling metal artifacts to prevent contamination from skin oils and salts.

Electrolysis Applications for Removing Metal Corrosion

  1. Power source: 12V battery charger connected to workpiece (negative) and sacrificial anodes (positive).
  2. Electrolyte solution: One tablespoon washing soda per gallon water in a non-conductive container.
  3. Ventilation: Outdoor setup prevents hydrogen accumulation from cathode reactions.

Corrosion removal typically requires 24-48 hours until bubbling slows.

Post-treatment, black residue brushes off easily with brass bristles.

Unlike acidic methods that etch metal, this base solution preserves patina and bluing while stabilizing rust deposits on anodes.

Scrap graphite pieces can replace rebar as more efficient, rust-resistant electrodes that conduct electricity better.Applying paste wax after thorough drying provides additional protection against future rust formation.

Immediate drying and oil application prevent re-oxidation.

Freeze-Drying Technology for Waterlogged Organic Materials

When you apply freeze-drying to waterlogged organic materials, you’ll prevent the structural collapse that typically occurs during conventional air-drying by eliminating capillary stress through sublimation.

The process removes molecular water that supports microbial growth, effectively halting fungal infestation and mold development by transforming the artifact into an unsuitable host environment.

You must incorporate cryoprotectants like polyethylene glycol (PEG) before freezing to prevent cellular damage while achieving shrinkage reductions of 49 to 97 percent compared to naturally dried materials.

PEG treatments can be applied in multiple concentration stages using formulations such as PEG 400/4000 or PEG 400/1500/4000 to optimize stabilization based on the artifact’s degradation level.

Freeze-drying with synthetic wax demonstrates minimal shrinkage and produces preservation quality comparable to alternative conservation methods for archaeological wood.

Preventing Structural Damage

How can conservators prevent waterlogged archaeological wood from collapsing during preservation? Understanding freeze-drying effects on structural integrity requires careful mitigation strategies.

While sublimation prevents liquid surface tension from causing cell collapse, freezing water expands and risks material breakdown.

You’ll need these pre-treatment approaches:

  1. PEG impregnation – Polyethylene glycol doesn’t freeze-expand, protecting against volume changes during processing.
  2. Cryoprotectant application – PEG 400 prevents cracking more effectively than higher molecular weight variants.
  3. Pre-washing protocols – Low molecular mass PEG solutions mitigate expansion before freeze-drying begins.

Chemical impregnation compounds reduce deformation in slightly degraded oak-wood, while post-treatment PEG strengthens fragile structures.

You’ll achieve minimal shrinkage (ASET 49-97%, ASER 39-98%) compared to natural drying methods, maintaining dimensional stability without compromising your artifact’s authenticity.

Halting Microbial Growth

While waterlogged archaeological wood poses significant conservation challenges, freeze-drying technology delivers thorough microbial control by eliminating the moisture conditions pathogens require for survival. You’ll find the sublimation process removes molecular water completely, preventing bacterial and fungal proliferation without chemical additives.

The treatment protocol begins with polyethylene glycol immersion, replacing cellular water to create an inhospitable microbial environment. Subsequent freezing halts metabolic processes of existing pathogens, while vacuum conditions extract remaining moisture through sublimation rather than evaporation.

These preservation techniques outperform conventional air drying methods that leave liquid water accessible to microbial colonization. The anaerobic vacuum environment denies oxygen-dependent pathogens necessary conditions, achieving long-term stability.

You’re implementing complete moisture removal that transforms archaeological materials into poor hosts for mold, mildew, and fungus.

Mechanical Cleaning Methods Following Archaeological Standards

Archaeological conservators employ mechanical cleaning methods as the primary intervention for removing unwanted surface materials while preserving an artifact’s structural integrity and historical evidence. You’ll find these techniques require x-radiography assessment before treatment begins, ensuring you don’t compromise corroded layers containing valuable data.

Your mechanical cleaning toolkit includes:

  1. Manual instruments: Scalpels, tweezers, and soft brushes for precision dirt removal from ceramics, glass, and iron.
  2. Water-based methods: Gentle flow with stencil brushes for stable, low-porosity materials—detergents prohibited.
  3. Advanced technologies: Ultrasonic cleaners, pulse tools, and micro-drills for intricate encrustation work.

Laser cleaning and micro abrasion techniques offer exceptional precision for calcifications and thick encrustations.

You must avoid sandblasting historic materials entirely. ICOM-CC guidelines direct proper implementation, demanding condition assessment through XRF and SEM documentation before intervention.

Selecting Consolidants for Different Environmental Conditions

matching consolidants to conditions

When selecting consolidants for archaeological finds, you’ll need to match the formulation’s solvent base to the artifact’s moisture state and environmental exposure history. Organic-solvent based consolidants like poly(vinyl) acetate resins (AYAA, AYAF) in acetone or toluene perform effectively on dry materials. However, they introduce toxicity concerns and solvent-related dimensional stresses in damp conditions.

Water-based emulsions such as Acrysol WS-24 eliminate organic solvent hazards while accommodating the elevated moisture content typical of freshly excavated bone. They dry rapidly enough to prevent excavation-induced cracking during field recovery.

Organic-Solvent Based Consolidants

Because moisture dramatically affects how consolidants perform, selecting organic-solvent based treatments requires careful assessment of environmental conditions at the excavation site.

Organic solvents like acetone enable consolidant penetration through rapid evaporation, making them ideal for dry environments where you’ll achieve the most favorable results.

You’ll encounter three critical incompatibilities with damp conditions:

  1. White gel or skin formation prevents proper solidification
  2. Residual moisture blocks solvent penetration into artifact matrices
  3. Incomplete drying compromises structural stabilization

For successful application, you’ll need completely dried artifacts with neutral to slightly alkaline pH (7-10).

Acryloid B72 dissolved in acetone at 2% concentration works effectively for bone and organic materials.

You can apply multiple layers since the solvent re-dissolves previous applications, allowing incremental strengthening.

Pre-treating with solvent drives off remaining moisture before consolidation.

Water-Based Emulsion Applications

Unlike organic-solvent treatments, water-based emulsions achieve consolidation through water evaporation rather than rapid solvent loss. This makes them particularly effective for damp (though not saturated) archaeological contexts.

You’ll find Rhoplex AC-33 demonstrates superior emulsion stability for shells, while Acrysol WS-24 prevents bone cracking during excavation.

These formulations contain particles ranging 0.1-1 micron, requiring careful application technique—brush gently to leverage capillary action without pooling.

Water penetration occurs ideally when you apply dilute solutions repeatedly (1.5% Aquazol concentration) rather than single concentrated treatments.

For damp terrestrial artifacts, dilute emulsions 1:4 with water before application.

You can’t reapply after drying without redissolving the film, unlike solvent-based alternatives.

Aquazol 500 offers reversibility and low toxicity, giving you flexibility in treatment protocols while maintaining professional conservation standards.

Supporting Fragile Objects With Backing Materials During Lifting

Fragile archaeological objects often require backing materials to maintain structural integrity during excavation and transport from burial contexts.

Backing techniques employ conservation-grade polymers as strengthening agents, creating adhesive layers that bond support materials to artifact surfaces.

You’ll select from various support materials—including nylon bandages, fibrous tissue, muslin, and linen—based on your object’s specific condition and composition.

The application process follows three critical steps:

  1. Apply diluted polymer solutions for initial consolidation of severely fragile objects.
  2. Use concentrated polymers to create adhesive layers for backing material attachment.
  3. Install protective separation layers using tissue or polyethylene film before wrapping.

This method proves essential for flat objects like wall plaster, mosaics, and metal plaques that can’t support their own weight.

You’ll maintain complete control over material selection and technique modification throughout the lifting process.

Jacketing and Transport Techniques for Large-Scale Finds

protective fossil transportation methods

When you’ve excavated a large-scale specimen requiring removal as a complete unit, you’ll need to apply protective surface layering that prevents direct contact between fossil and jacketing materials.

Your primary objective is stabilizing the fragile internal structure while creating rigid external support capable of withstanding transport stresses. This process requires systematic application of barrier films, reinforced plaster layers, and structural components that distribute weight-bearing loads across the jacket’s entire surface.

Protective Surface Layering Methods

Large-scale archaeological finds require immediate stabilization at the excavation site before any movement occurs. You’ll need protective wax applications to isolate artifact surfaces from environmental degradation without altering their original appearance. Nano coatings deliver transparent, microscopic barriers that shield precious metals from corrosion while maintaining authenticity.

Your layering strategy should include:

  1. Initial separation layers using tissue or clingy polyethylene film to prevent surface damage during handling
  2. Structural reinforcement through plaster-impregnated bandages for fragile ceramics and fractured objects
  3. Moisture retention systems incorporating damp polyether foam covered with black polyethylene sheeting

Conservation-grade polymers like Acryloid B72 serve as consolidants, while acrylic coatings provide corrosion-resistant barriers over metal surfaces.

You’ll maintain control over preservation outcomes through methodical application of these evidence-based techniques.

Stabilizing Fragile Vessel Structures

Before attempting any movement of excavated vessels, you’ll implement jacketing protocols that transform fragile artifacts into stable transport units. Innovative wrapping begins with crepe bandages wound around exposed rims using overlapping edges, secured with safety pins to maintain tension.

You’ll progress incrementally as excavation advances through spits, preserving internal soil that provides critical structural support for laboratory micro-excavation.

Supportive bandaging requires reverse-direction reinforcement—wrapping downward to the base, then returning upward for dual-layer protection.

Apply hospital-grade plaster bandages or burlap-plaster combinations in perpendicular orientations, ensuring tight adhesion without gaps.

Undercut rock edges sufficiently while retaining support material beneath specimens.

Strategic weight distribution prevents stress concentration on fragile zones.

For extended transport, employ heat-sealed vapour barrier bags with oxygen scavengers, creating anoxic environments that arrest degradation during shipping logistics.

Creating Rigid Transport Support

How do you transform an unwieldy archaeological specimen into a transportable unit without compromising its structural integrity? Field jacketing provides autonomous control over preservation outcomes.

You’ll construct rigid protective shells using plaster-impregnated gauze over aluminum foil barriers, which conform to irregular surfaces without disturbing surface patination or adhesive bonding between soil matrix and artifacts.

The encapsulation method requires three critical components:

  1. Barrier layer application using aluminum foil for dry specimens or polyether foam for waterlogged materials
  2. Plaster-reinforced gauze wrapping over acid-free tissue to create load-bearing shells
  3. Weight distribution analysis identifying support points within jacket interiors

For oversized finds like kilns or furnaces, block lifting proves essential.

You’ll line excavated pedestals with protective film before applying expanding polyurethane foam or plaster-vermiculite matrices, creating transportable monoliths independent of institutional oversight.

Field Consolidation Protocols Before Artifact Removal

When archaeological materials emerge from burial environments, they face immediate threats from rapid environmental changes that can compromise their structural integrity within minutes to hours.

You’ll need to apply consolidants before artifact removal, guaranteeing objects maintain stability during extraction. Select materials based on site conditions: organic-solvent consolidants work in dry contexts through rapid evaporation, while water-based emulsions suit damp environments.

Acryloid B-72 remains the standard for bone consolidation due to its long-term stability.

Apply consolidant by soaking your brush and letting capillary action draw liquid onto surfaces—multiple passes ensure complete coverage.

Remote sensing and spatial analysis help you map fragile zones requiring priority treatment.

Prevent moisture fluctuations during application; solvent-based products form white residue in dampness, while water-based options won’t dry in saturated contexts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Personal Protective Equipment Should Conservators Wear During Chemical Stabilization Treatments?

You’ll need extensive protective gear including chemical-resistant gloves, safety goggles, face shields, and appropriate respiratory protection like SCBAs. Chemical safety requires full-body coverage with resistant clothing and boots, ensuring no gaps exist during stabilization treatments.

How Much Does Freeze-Drying Equipment Cost for Small Archaeological Conservation Labs?

Conservation lab equipment for freeze drying costs between $1,499-$30,000 for small archaeological facilities. You’ll find benchtop models ideal at $10,000-$30,000, while compact mini units start at $1,499. Freeze drying costs depend on capacity and automation features you need.

Can Volunteers Perform Basic Cleaning Tasks or Must Professionals Handle All Artifacts?

You’ll find that volunteers *can* perform basic cleaning on robust artifacts—but here’s the catch: they need proper volunteer training first. Basic cleaning requires supervised instruction on appropriate techniques, materials, and documentation protocols before handling any collection items.

How Long Does the Complete Conservation Process Typically Take From Excavation to Display?

The complete conservation process typically spans 2.5+ years from excavation to display. You’ll follow conservation ethics through artifact labeling, desalination, treatment, and documentation stages. Timeline varies based on material type and preservation requirements you encounter.

What Insurance Coverage Is Needed When Transporting High-Value Archaeological Finds?

You’ll need thorough nail-to-nail transit coverage meeting insurance requirements and transportation regulations. This protects artifacts from packing through installation, includes climate-controlled shipping, professional handling protocols, and documentation standards that ensure your collection’s autonomy throughout its journey.

References

Scroll to Top